The 218th Signature: Will Today Finally Force the Epstein Files Vote?
Adelita Grijalva’s oath may trigger the most consequential vote Congress has faced in years.
📌 NOTE FOR NEW READERS:
50501 is a grassroots movement that organizes peaceful action to defend democracy. We have over 80,000 subscribers to our Substack community. If you’re new here, welcome! If this resonates with you, hit the subscribe button to stay connected.
TL;DR
After 49 days of delay, Adelita Grijalva will finally be sworn in becoming the 218th signature forcing a House vote to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.
All 212 Democrats + 4 Republicans signed, bypassing Speaker Mike Johnson.
Skeptics warn: Trump opposes it, Johnson can stall it, and the DOJ says no “client list” exists. Only 4% of discharge petitions ever succeed.
Meanwhile: Trump pushes a fake $2,000 tariff plan, and the EPA quietly weakens PFAS reporting.
Today, after a 49-day stall, Adelita Grijalva takes the oath of office in Arizona.
Her name becomes the 218th signature, the threshold that could force a House vote to release the Epstein files.
Behind the scenes, pressure is mounting.
Trump has called the effort a hoax.
Leadership is scrambling to contain it.
And survivors are watching, hoping this time transparency wins.
How a Discharge Petition Can Bypass the Speaker’s Power
Most of the time, the Speaker of the House controls what gets voted on. If leadership doesn’t want a vote, there’s no vote.
But there’s a loophole: the discharge petition.
If 218 members of the House, a majority that sign a petition, they can force a floor vote on ANY bill, bypassing leadership entirely.
It’s basically democracy’s emergency brake. It’s a way for the majority to overrule power when power doesn’t act.
How it happens:
218 members sign the petition
Wait 7 legislative days
A member announces intent to bring it to the floor
Leadership must hold a vote within 2 days
However, discharge petitions almost never succeed. Since 1931, only about 4% have actually forced votes. Leadership has dozens of ways to kill them such as procedural tricks, behind-the-scenes pressure, and deals cut to make signers back down.
That’s why what’s happening today is so important.
And why people are both hopeful and deeply skeptical.
The Road to 218: How Congress Forced the Epstein Files Vote
In July 2025, Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna of California introduced a bill requiring the Justice Department to release every document, every record, every piece of evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell investigations.
All of it to be searchable online within 30 days.
Speaker Mike Johnson refused to allow a vote so Massie and Khanna filed a discharge petition.
They needed 218 signatures.
All 212 House Democrats signed.
Four Republicans defied Trump and GOP leadership to sign:
Thomas Massie (Kentucky)
Lauren Boebert (Colorado)
Marjorie Taylor Greene (Georgia) (one of Trump’s closest allies)
Nancy Mace (South Carolina)
That’s 216.
Then in September, Rep. James Walkinshaw won a special election in Virginia and became the 217th signature.
And now: Adelita Grijalva. Number 218.
The moment Grijalva signs, which she’s promised to do immediately after being sworn in, the clock starts.
Seven legislative days until someone can force the vote.
Johnson has known this was coming.
That’s part of why he delayed her swearing-in for 49 days.
Inside the Files: What Survivors Want Released
The Justice Department released a 2-page memo in July claiming there’s no “client list,” no evidence Epstein blackmailed anyone, and that Epstein died by suicide (not murder)
Many people, on both the left and right and everything in the middle, don’t believe it.
Here’s what we know the files contain:
Island visitor logbooks from Little St. James (Epstein’s private island)
Boat trip logs documenting who traveled to/from the island
Employee contact lists
“Documents with names” (the DOJ’s own vague description)
40 computers and electronic devices
26 storage drives
Over 70 CDs
Flight logs (mostly already public through Maxwell’s trial)
Over 10,000 images and videos of abuse (sealed by courts to protect victims and will most likely never be released)
The House Oversight Committee has already released 33,000+ pages of documents. Heavily redacted. Many duplicates of things already public.
But people want the rest. The visitor logs. The “documents with names.” The stuff DOJ says doesn’t show criminal behavior but refuses to release anyway.
Survivors of Epstein’s abuse support the full release. They’ve testified before Congress. They’ve stood with Massie and Khanna at press conferences. They want transparency and justice.
Trump opposes it. He calls the entire push a “Democrat hoax.”
Do you think the Epstein files will actually be released? Or is this political theater that goes nowhere?
How Political Pressure Could Derail the 218th Signature
Getting to 218 signatures was the hard part.
But actually getting a vote and then passing it might be harder.
Here’s why people are skeptical that this will work:
1. Trump Opposes It
He’s publicly called it a hoax. Behind the scenes, the White House has been pressuring Republicans not to sign. Trump was friends with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s. In 2003, he even sent Epstein a sexually explicit birthday letter (that he denies). He has every reason to want this to go away.
2. Johnson Can Kill It Procedurally
Even with 218 signatures, the Speaker has tools. He can schedule a “rule vote” to “table” the discharge petition, essentially voting to kill the whole thing before it reaches the floor. Johnson did this earlier this year with a different discharge petition, and it worked.
3. Senate Won’t Touch It
Even if it passes the House, Senate Majority Leader John Thune has said he doesn’t think the Senate needs to vote on it. Without Senate approval, the bill dies.
4. DOJ Already Said No
The July memo concluded: “No further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.” Courts have sealed much of the evidence to protect victims. The department argues releasing everything would violate those court orders and re-traumatize survivors.
5. History Says It Won’t Work
Only 4% of discharge petitions since 1931 have forced actual votes. Leadership almost always finds a way to kill them.
But here’s why it might be different this time:
Bipartisan Public Pressure: Polls show majorities of both Democrats and Republicans want the files released. Even Trump’s base is demanding it.
Four Republicans Defied Trump: Massie, Boebert, Greene, and Mace signed despite direct White House pressure.
Survivors Are Leading: This isn’t just politicians grandstanding. Actual victims are at the table, demanding justice.
218 Is 218: If the petition proceeds, leadership can’t stop it without Republicans voting against their own signatures.
Johnson told reporters he won’t block it if it reaches 218. Whether he actually honors that promise is another question.
Tell us your “Other” in the comments:
The $2,000 Shiny Object
While everyone watches the shutdown re-opening and the potential voting to release the Epstein files, Trump quietly floated something else this week: $2,000 checks for Americans, supposedly funded by tariff revenue.
Sounds great, right? Except the math doesn’t really work.
If everyone making under $100,000 got $2,000, that’s roughly $300 billion (based on prior stimulus-era distributions.)
Tariffs aren’t projected to generate anywhere near that. In recent years, tariff revenue has hovered around $80 to $90 billion annually, and even Trump’s proposed “universal tariff” would struggle to reach $200 billion, according to economic estimates.
That’s still a massive gap.
Trump has also claimed tariffs would help pay down the national debt.
But you can’t spend the same dollar twice.
Adding to the confusion, one of Trump’s economic advisors, Scott Bessent, appeared on TV after the announcement and suggested it might not be actual checks, it might just be tax cuts already signed into law.
So: is it a policy? Or just more political theater?
Either way, it looks like a shiny distraction designed to change the subject.
The EPA Weakens Rules on Cancer-Linked ‘Forever Chemicals’
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the federal agency responsible for keeping our air, water, and soil safe. It’s supposed to hold corporations accountable when pollution threatens public health.
PFAS, short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are man-made “forever chemicals” used in everything from nonstick pans to waterproof jackets. They’re nearly impossible to destroy, which means once they enter our water or soil, they stay there and so do the health risks.
On Monday, the EPA proposed rolling back requirements for companies to report their use of PFAS, ”forever chemicals” linked to cancer, immune damage, and fertility problems.
New exemptions mean companies can stop reporting if:
PFAS make up less than 0.1% of a product
They’re byproducts
They’re in imported goods
They’re used for R&D
These chemicals are dangerous at 4 parts per trillion. That’s drops in Olympic-sized pools.
The Biden rule required comprehensive tracking. Now, communities are losing the ability to trace contamination when it appears in their water.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin calls it “reducing regulatory burdens.”
The EPA calls it “reducing burdens.” Maybe they mean corporate ones.
Because the burden won’t disappear, it’ll just move downstream. Onto the families whose water quietly turns toxic. Onto the parents who can’t afford a blood test. Onto the hospitals about to see another wave of patients in January, right when the ACA subsidies expire and healthcare costs double for millions.
They’re deregulating the poison and defunding the cure.
Epstein Files, Tariffs, and Forever Chemicals
A congresswoman forced to wait 49 days because her signature might trigger accountability.
A $2,000 promise with no plan, possibly meant to distract us from questions people are asking.
Regulations gutted so companies don’t have to report what’s poisoning communities.
In each case, power is working to avoid being seen.
Delay the signature that forces transparency.
Distract with impossible economics.
Deregulate so no one can track the harm.
Which story matters most to you right now: Epstein files, tariff theater, or forever chemicals? Tell us what you think. Share your thoughts in the comments
They Reached the Number.
Now We’ll See Who Meant It.
Adelita Grijalva will be sworn in today at 2 PM Arizona time.
She’ll sign the discharge petition.
Seven legislative days later, Massie or Khanna can announce on the House floor their intent to force a vote.
Two days after that, the vote must happen.
Unless Johnson finds a way to kill it first, Republicans who signed get pressured to back down, the vote happens and fails, or it passes the House but dies in the Senate.
There are a dozen ways this doesn’t work.
But 218 members of Congress, including four Republicans willing to defy their president, believe the public deserves to see what the government knows about Jeffrey Epstein.
Survivors deserve justice and transparency.
The public deserves accountability.
And today, for the first time in 49 days, the person who can make that vote happen finally gets to do her job.
Whether it actually leads anywhere is a different question.
But the signature happens today and that’s a start.
THANK YOU
To all of you who continue to choose courage over comfort in the ballot box, in conversation, and in acts of conscience. You are the reason democracy endures. Progress never happens by accident, it happens because people like you still care enough to make it.
Blue | The 50501 Movement | 80,000+ Reader Activists Strong | fiftyfifty.one
P.S. The 218th signature is historic whether the vote happens or not. It means a bipartisan majority of the House agrees: transparency matters more than protecting powerful people who might be embarrassed. That’s worth noting. And if Johnson finds a way to kill it anyway, remember who blocked it and why. The obstruction is always part of the story.
They will probably never be released but by forcing a vote we will see who all of the Guardians of Pedophiles are.
Okay so they'll get the vote to release the files. Eventually. Meaning there's many a slip between cup and lip. Then they'll vote in the house and the senate and? They could, judging why the way donnie little dick is running this show be a year or two or 3! Then of course the SCOTUS will be brought into it and then the files while be so redacted to protect "the innocent" that it won't actually name names. What we need is the women involved to tell their side of the story and name the names. With protection from those rich bastards in power!