Trump Dropped His IRS Lawsuit. Now There’s a $1.7 Billion Taxpayer Fund.
Trump will not get a check, but the settlement created a taxpayer-funded system for people who claim they were politically targeted.
📌 NOTE FOR NEW READERS: This is an independent publication covering 50501, No Kings, and the broader pro-democracy and civic-action ecosystem. Subscribe to join our community and to keep us posting.
TLDR
Trump dropped his $10 billion IRS lawsuit, and DOJ says he will receive an apology but no money. But the settlement created a new $1.776 billion taxpayer-funded “Anti-Weaponization Fund” for people who claim they were politically targeted by the government. The major concern is not whether Trump personally gets a check. It is who qualifies for this money, who decides, whether January 6 defendants could benefit, and whether the public will ever see the full list of payouts.
What Happened This Morning
Attorneys for President Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization filed notice in federal court in Miami voluntarily dismissing the IRS lawsuit with prejudice. The case is closed and the same claims can’t be refiled. The suit was over the leak of confidential tax information tied to Trump, his sons, the Trump Organization, and other wealthy Americans in 2019 and 2020 by Charles Littlejohn, a former IRS contractor who pleaded guilty in 2023 and is currently serving a five-year federal sentence.
Within hours, the Justice Department announced what was created in exchange.
What we know about the Anti-Weaponization Fund
Size and source. $1.776 billion, drawn from the federal Judgment Fund, a permanent Treasury account normally used to pay specific court judgments and settlements against the government.
Stated purpose. To issue formal apologies and monetary relief to people who claim they were harmed by government “weaponization” or “lawfare.” Filing a claim is voluntary, and DOJ says there are no partisan requirements.
Oversight structure. Five commissioners appointed by the Attorney General, with one chosen in consultation with congressional leadership. The President can remove any member.
Reporting. Quarterly updates go to the Attorney General, not to the public. The fund can be audited at the Attorney General’s direction.
The Deadline. DOJ says the fund must stop processing claims in December 2028, just before the end of President Trump’s term. Any unspent money reverts to the federal government.
Trump’s role. Trump and the other plaintiffs receive a formal apology but no monetary damages. They also agreed to withdraw two other administrative claims totaling $230 million, one tied to the Mar-a-Lago search and one to the Russia investigation.
Trump will not receive a check from this fund.
Why this is More Than a lawsuit:
Congress holds the power of the purse.
Only Congress can appropriate public money. It keeps the executive branch from spending taxpayer dollars however it chooses, on whomever it favors.
The Judgment Fund is a narrow exception. It lets the government pay specific legal obligations without Congress passing a new spending bill each time. It is a back-end mechanism for settling individual legal claims. This arrangement stretches that system beyond its role: paying judgments and settlements, not standing up a new compensation program with political significance.
What the Justice Department has now done is reach into that system and use it to launch a nearly $2 billion compensation program.
No congressional vote.
No Senate confirmation for the commissioners who will decide who gets paid.
No DOJ-announced requirement that the public receive a list of beneficiaries, award amounts, or decision standards.
The commissioners are picked by the Attorney General. The President can fire them. The reports stay inside the department.
Paul Figley, who spent 32 years in DOJ’s Civil Division and has written extensively on the Judgment Fund, told Axios that this amounts to “creating a government program... without going through Congress and having Congress set it up and fund it.” A group of 93 House Democrats filed an amicus brief calling the arrangement “collusive litigation” and warning that it implicates the separation of powers, the Domestic Emoluments Clause, and the two-year statute of limitations.
Senator Ron Wyden, the ranking Democrat on Senate Finance, called the move “a stunning act of corruption.” Senator Elizabeth Warren called it “a giant slush fund of taxpayer dollars.”
The January 6, handled carefully
DOJ has not publicly released eligibility criteria or named beneficiaries.
What is confirmed is that ABC News and TIME reported before today’s announcement that the proposed fund could include people charged in connection with January 6, and Reuters notes that “weaponization” and “lawfare” are terms the President and his allies have used to describe criminal cases, including those arising from the Capitol attack. The Hill reports that several convicted January 6 defendants have pending civil suits. Whether any of them ultimately receive money is not yet known. The question is now on the table.
We Need Answers
Who sits on the five-member commission, and what are their qualifications?
What standard of evidence will claimants have to meet?
Will the names of beneficiaries and the amounts awarded be made public?
Is there an appeal process, and if so, who hears it?
How will the public know whether anyone connected to January 6 receives compensation?
Supporting this Newsletter
We are an independent, reader-funded publication. No ads, & No corporate sponsorship. We run on careful reporting, a lot of caffeine, research, and a commitment to giving readers solid ground to stand on. If that feels worth funding, becoming a paid subscriber is how you keep us going here on Substack. Your support is not for content access, it’s to help us research and get information out to as many people as possible. Thanks for reading!
Sources:
DOJ Office of Public Affairs
ABC News
Axios
CNBC
The Hill
NPR
Washington Post